Trigger Architecture Without a 40-Class Framework
Most Apex trigger logic needs one entry point, thin routing, bulk-safe services, and change-aware guards. It does not automatically need a metadata-driven framework.
6 posts in this channel.
Most Apex trigger logic needs one entry point, thin routing, bulk-safe services, and change-aware guards. It does not automatically need a metadata-driven framework.
LWC communication gets easier when the mechanism matches the relationship: properties down, events up, LMS across page boundaries, and state managers across a complex component subtree.
Errors become much easier to handle when LWC, Apex, and Flow agree on a small contract: stable codes for automation, safe messages for people, and correlation details for support.
Flow and Apex overlap, but they are not interchangeable. I use Flow for visible orchestration and Apex when data structures, transaction control, scale, or reuse become the real problem.
LDS, GraphQL, and Apex can all put Salesforce data into an LWC. The useful question is not which one is best, but which is the smallest honest fit for the operation.
Summer '26 gives LWC a native state layer. Use it to coordinate complex pages without coupling every reusable component to one state shape.